Previously we considered that Time, Distance and Speed are not a smooth flowing congruent material that can be infinitely parsed into smaller and smaller pieces but indeed have smallest units which cannot be divided.

Time and Mass effect on Time is most intriguing.

When one considers time. It is hard to give a definition to time ,but to simply say it is that which separates individual frames of reality or perhaps more accurately energy states much as an old film reel has different frames which click past the aperture. One might say hogwash! I don’t even think time exists. But we can measure it so surely it is real. We also know for a fact that it can be affected by outside forces.

In the 60s highly accurate timepieces were placed aboard satellites and orbited about the earth at ‘fast’ speeds. The timepieces showed time had infact slowed in relation to ‘stationary’ timepieces on earth. Movies were made where men ventured into space and achieved light speed. When they returned to earth after what was one to two years to them ,a millennium had passed on the surface.

It is a fact to state that time slows down with increasing velocities.

Another fact is that time slows down near a gravity source or mass. It is quite certain that time moves more slowly at the surface of the earth than at 20,000 miles in space. In fact the GPS satellites we all rely on so heavily in our everyday life,  orbit approximately 23k miles in space in a geosynchronous orbit. If one took the speed of light as a constant over this distance, an accuracy beyond about 100 yards could not be achieved as distance travelled by the radio signal (speed of light) will not equal the time past on the surface.

It is a fact to state that time slows down with increasing gravity effect.

So one of the key properties of any mass is it’s effect on the surrounding environ and the flow of time in that environ. This explains a quandary that many of us have growing up. How often we lift a weight and it falls back to earth by an invisible hand. We wonder how can the earth pull the rock with no connection. The truth is the earth is not pulling the rock at all. What is occurring is the part of the rock nearest the earth has time moving slightly more slowly that the part of the rock away from the earth. So there is a time gradient across the rock which forces the rock toward the slower time region which is down. So gravity doesn’t pull at all. The rock is pushed by the time gradient.

Gravity doesn’t pull at all, it creates a time gradient across the rock which forces the rock toward the slower time region which is down.

Think how this could be useful. If we could create a mass effect on time without the mass we could effortlessly move object about with little energy.

For instance, what if, we found that a mass effect could be created at the bisection of two beams of elementary particles.Say neutrinos and anti-neutrinos. If we could control where this intersection occurred and it’s intensity, We could create a time graddient. Consider this simple drawing of a cart from the top.

Let’s pretend we have a cart with two different types of beams mounted on it. Simply labelled beam 1 and beam 2. If we directed these beams forward and medial, at the intersection a mass-time effect is created so in effect it would be as though a large mass was in front of the cart. The cart would move down the time gradient towards the intersection ,much as a dog with a bone dangled in front of it. Now if we pointed the beams upward, the cart could hover above the ground. Floating effortlessly. We need to learn precisely how ‘Mass’ Effect the flow of time and learn to simulate it. It would be a greater achievement than the wheel.

Today I was watching a demonstration of young people challenging the new president elect, Donald Trump.

One of the young ladies asked, “Will I be paid the same as a man?” and “Will the government be telling me what I can do with my body?”

He retorted “If you work as hard as a man, you will be paid the same by law.”

A good response I thought ,but he ignored the more challenging question.

I thought about the quandary, and wondered ‘My Body’. If an artist paints a picture, does the picture own itself? If an engineer designs and has a plane built, does the plane now own itself? Obviously I am intimating that an infinite intelligence created the universe and all in it,and he is in fact the owner of that young girls body. She certainly did not create or design it ,it is difficult to see how it is hers. Even an atheist might accept that she did nothing to fabricate or purchase the body and in fact it is the property of evolutionary forces. As she was not given an evolutionary power to spontaneously abort a baby much as I can clear my eyes by blinking. How is it a ‘right’ to terminate a pregnancy she allowed to occur with unnatural abortive techniques.

Just as it is not a widely accepted right to terminate one’s own life it should not be a right to terminate anothers.